Casino jack and the united states of money review

Sign in with Facebook Other Sign in options. After binge watching " Stranger Things 2 ," we run down some visit web page questions we'd like addressed next time we revisit Hawkins, Ind. Casino Jack and the United States of Money An in-depth look at the rise and fall of New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, including interviews with the scandalized, former politician.

Filmmaker Alex Gibney investigates the fact that the click here Americans control more wealth than the million people in the bottom 50 percent of the population.

For three weeks in Septemberone person was charged with preventing the collapse of the global economy. No one understood the financial markets better than Hank Paulson, the former A documentary about the Enron corporation, its faulty and corrupt business practices, and how they led to its fall. Nearly years after its creation, the power of the U. Federal Reserve has never been greater.

Markets and governments around the world hold their breath in anticipation of the Fed A comprehensive look at the Bush Administration's conduct of the Iraq war and its occupation of the country. Chronicles fundamentalist Islam's rise to power and explores Wright's struggle to maintain his objectivity as a journalist writing about Islamic terror. After the Chicago Cubs blow an opportunity to reach the World Series inCubs fans blame the team's misfortune on fellow fan Steve Bartman, who interfered with a foul ball and prevented Moises Alou from making a catch.

In ice hockey, no one is tougher than the "goon". Those casino jack and the united states of money review have one mission: A documentary that details the creation of Julian Assange 's controversial website, which facilitated the article source security breach in U.

A probing investigation into the lies, greed and corruption surrounding D. When mega-lobbyist Jack Abramoff was sentenced to jail in earlyhe was seen as the personification of corruption, along with Tom DeLay and Bob Ney. But as "Casino Jack and the United States of Money" shows, Abramoff and the individuals associated with him were just the tip of casino jack and the united states of money review iceberg.

Alex Gibney's documentary takes the same approach to its topic that his previous documentary "Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room" does, looking at the roots of the main character, Они online roulette deutschland erlaubt говорит how deregulation led to the culmination. The documentary looks at those, and goes a little further into Abramoff's role in the http://onatra.info/trusted-online-casinos-for-us-players.php Republicans, alliance with Angolan source Jonas Savimbi, and more.

One of the most important points is how Abramoff and Ralph Reed used religious fundamentalism, specifically how Reed was making large sums of money through links to Indian casinos while pontificating against gambling. But the most important topic that the documentary brings up is that this is neither "a few bad apples" nor a conspiracy. This happened because the American people let it happen by neglecting to casino jack and the united states of money review democracy seriously.

Prevention of such events in the future requires the American people to stay vigilant of their government, and of corporations. Everyone should see this documentary. Find showtimes, watch trailers, browse photos, track your Watchlist and rate your favorite movies and TV shows on your phone or tablet! Some parts of this page won't work property. Please reload or try later. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Error Please try again! Check in you enable Facebook sharing!

Safest casino online sites Cast and Crew. Share this Rating Title: Casino Jack and the United States of Money 7. Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Learn more People who liked this also liked The Rise and Fall of Eliot Spitzer Money, Power and the American Dream The Smartest Guys in the Room Inside the Federal Reserve A documentary that follows the money behind the rise of the Tea Party.

No End in Sight We're Not Broke Henry, Chuck Collins, Bernie Sanders. My Trip to Al-Qaeda The Casino jack and the united states of money review Gladiators The Story of WikiLeaks Edit Cast Cast overview, first billed only: Himself - Lobbyist archive footage. Edit Storyline A probing investigation into the lies, greed and corruption surrounding D.

Edit Details Official Sites: Edit Did You Know? Trivia Who was part of the filming crew who is related to Nicky Scarfo Jr, but goes by a different name? Quotes [ first lines ] Jack Abramoff: No one watches documentaries. You should make an action film! Add the first question. Was this review helpful to you? Audible Download Audio Books. Herself - Author, Gang of Four. Himself - Representative, California. Himself - Author, The Wrecking Crew. Himself - Director, Institute of World Politics.

Himself - Republican Activist archive footage. Himself - Former Chief of Staff to Rep. Himself - Representative, Ohio. Himself - Senator, Illinois.


Casino Jack and the United States of Money Reviews - Metacritic Casino jack and the united states of money review

Gibney won an Oscar for Documentary Video slots deposit code in Casino Jack regurgitated the identical story the media had proffered about "evil" Abramoff, and thematically repeated a documentary on Abramoff by Bill Moyers several years ago. Gibney's film would have been a far more insightful and compelling work had it been even-handed. Even though I found his Abramoff documentary tendentious and flawed, I admire and respect Gibney and his work very much.

Politically, we are both hard-core liberals. Because I was writing a book about Abramoff and secretly interviewing him before and during his imprisonment, Gibney and I have been occasionally meeting and talking about the Abramoff scandal for the past three years. There are so many disappointing things with this documentary I don't know where to begin.

My overarching problem was that Gibney made no attempt to be objective, and that he omitted a plethora of important information that might have afforded the audience the opportunity to draw a more balanced, nuanced, and certainly more informed conclusion about this complex scandal.

Gibney apparently knew what his conclusion would be long in advance. Presumably for that reason, he did not interview casino jack and the united states of money review who defended Abramoff or anyone who argued that this scandal was far more convoluted than the simplistic, black-and-white narrative that has been repetitiously presented on the public and now by Gibney. The film opens with footage of the mob murder of Florida businessman Gus Boulis, even though Abramoff had met Boulis only once and had absolutely nothing casino jack and the united states of money review do with his murder.

Soon, there is footage of the casinos operated by Abramoff's tribal clients. Clearly, these casinos http://onatra.info/casino-games-free-blackjack.php on par with those in Las Vegas and Atlantic City. And clearly, these thriving casinos, earning hundreds of millions of dollars a year, belong to Indians who are well-to-do, not bumpkins that just fell off casino bonus no playthrough log.

They can afford the best consultants, lawyers, accountants, and lobbyists. Hence, these particular Indians--for whom Abramoff was the lobbyist--were hardly unsophisticated.

Although a handful in the audience might have grasped this, Gibney should have made this point explicitly clear. A large part of what drove the virulent antipathy toward Abramoff was fueled by our collective guilt over the genocide that our European ancestors had committed casino jack and the united states of money review the Native Americans. Inthere were wild celebrations across the country. But inthere were essentially no national or regional celebrations to mark an extraordinary numerical anniversary: We were too ashamed.

Yes, the public was infuriated with Abramoff. Here was this white man-- the fact that he was an Orthodox Jew only made matters worse --stealing candy from these poor and unsophisticated Indians. The Washington Postwhich broke this story, exploited this undercurrent of shame brilliantly and cynically. I feel it was disingenuous of Gibney not to make clear in his film that these particular Indians--whom Abramoff was accused of defrauding--were not your stereotypic unemployed Indian, boozing it up on a hard-scrabble reservation.

In the end, these Indians proved to be far more sophisticated than Washington uber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff. John McCain, former chair of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, which also investigated Abramoff, wanted to impart was that not only had Abramoff defrauded his clients, but he had been an ineffective and lousy lobbyist. In other words, they wanted the public to believe that all these gullible, unsophisticated Indians had not only been bamboozled into paying Abramoff gargantuan sums, but had received little or nothing in return.

This, however, is untrue. Abramoff was perhaps the most effective Indian lobbyist who ever lived. It would have been fair if Gibney had at least made that clear in his film.

But he did not. Apparently, Gibney preferred Abramoff's iconic image as the indelibly vile pariah, Indian exploiter, and corrupter of the democratic process. Gibney describes how Abramoff, remember, a lobbyist advocates for and protects his clients the same way a lawyer doesprotected the interests of his client, the Choctaw Indians of Mississippi, so that its casino could keep making money.

If a nearby casino were to open it would hurt his client's revenue stream. So Abramoff worked hard to make sure no competing casino ever opened up. Casino jack and the united states of money review is the American Way, for better or worse. The Choctaws ran a very lucrative casino near the Alabama border. The Jena Tribe, also located nearby in Mississippi, wanted to open its own casino, which would have put a big dent in the Choctaws' profits.

But first, the Jena Tribe needed to get federal approval. But Gibney made it seem that Abramoff's successful efforts were somehow sleazy. But that's not the point.

Abramoff did his job. He may have charged a lot, but he did save the Choctaws many hundreds of millions of dollars--far, far in excess of what he charged his client. Gibney should have pointed that out. Gibney also completely omitted another far more spectacular Choctaw success that Abramoff engineered.

He somehow stopped a referendum in next-door Alabama that would have led to the opening of Indian casinos in that state.

Since most of the Choctaw casino clients came from Alabama, the passage of that referendum would have probably put their casino out of business. Once again, Abramoff saved his client hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars, something Gibney did not to mention. Gibney omitted click here impressive Abramoff lobbying coup involving the wealthy Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana, which also operated a casino and resort.

The Louisiana Coushatta had applied to the Bureau of Indian Affairs BIA in for permission to purchase about 9, acres of land "in trust" to augment the size of its reservation. For nearly 75 years, the BIA did nothing but sit on that application. Again, Gibney made no mention of this. Abramoff's biggest lobbying coup for the Louisiana Coushatta was shutting down a casino east of Houston, Texas, that may have put his client's casino out of business.

It may seem hard to believe, but a complicating factor involved his also shutting down the casino of a tribe miles away in El Paso, Texas. Gibney focused a lot of attention on the Tigua tribe of El Paso.

This pivotal and controversial episode in the Abramoff scandal is the one which reporter Susan Schmidt of The Washington Postwhom Gibney interviewed extensively in the filmmanufactured so that Abramoff would appear спросил slots online casinos меняя be the most deceitful villain who'd had ever slithered out of the slime.

Schmidt claimed that Abramoff had secretly shut down the Tigua's casino simply so he could appear the very next day in order to persuade the tribe to hire him to get its casino reopened! The ultimate sleazebag, right? It was Schmidt who was sleazy--some would say dishonest--in how she manipulated the facts. But her little work of fiction created such a firestorm of public fury against Abramoff that it helped her win a Pulitzer Prize, which, in my opinion, should be rescinded.

What's more, it was also the final straw that made Abramoff's imprisonment inevitable. The problem is that Schmidt withheld a crucial piece of information from her story. Here are the facts. Please bear with me. This is a bit complicated. Back inthere was one tribal casino in Texas, and it was being operated illegally something Gibney neglected to mention by the Tigua Tribe in El Paso. There was a second tribe preparing to open its own illegal casino miles casino jack and the united states of money review, east of Houston.

That second tribe is confusingly called the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas. A pending bill in the Texas state legislature would have legalized both tribal casinos.

Abramoff's client--the Louisiana Coushatta, who had just purchased 9, acres of land thanks to Abramoff and DeLayoperated a very lucrative casino near casino jack and the united states of money review Texas border--felt very threatened.

Most of its gamblers drove three hours from the Houston area to play slot machines and blackjack in its casino. Had the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas opened its own casino east of Houston, Abramoff's client, the Louisiana Coushatta, might have been forced out of business.

Why drive three hours to gamble when a new casino has just opened minutes away? Here's the point of this complex-sounding story. Abramoff needed to stop that Texas bill which would have legalized the two tribal casinos, even though only one of them--the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas--threatened his Louisiana client.

Obviously, Abramoff had absolutely no interest in shutting down the Tigua casino, because it was located in El Paso, miles from and therefore no threat to his client in Louisiana. Casino jack and the united states of money review, yes, if Abramoff could find a way to kill the bill, the Tigua casino would also be shut down. In another brilliant lobbying coup, which Gibney once again failed to point outAbramoff managed to derail the Texas bill. The bill had already passed in the Texas House by an vote margin.

It would have easily passed in the Texas Senate by an even greater margin, but Abramoff was somehow able to prevent the bill from ever reaching the Senate floor for a vote!

Hence, the bill failed to become law and both tribal casinos were shut down. She claimed that Abramoff's sole purpose was to shut down the Tigua's casino so he could persuade them to hire him to get it reopened. She completely omitted the fact that the casino of another tribe--the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas--was the one and only one he was really interested in shuttering.

Her name had appeared on a recent story in which those two facts were identified by her! Hence, it would appear that Schmidt deliberately omitted casino jack and the united states of money review key bit of information simply so her story would make Abramoff's behavior seem so reprehensible. I discussed this complicated story a number of times with Gibney. He didn't seem as outraged as I. But he did end up conceding in his film that Abramoff's shuttering of the Tigua casino was "collateral damage.

She simply omitted the name of the second tribe and, most importantly, that the second tribe was Abramoff's real target. Given Schmidt's previous reporting, she knew that the real reason for Abramoff's actions were not what she reported, but rather to protect his Louisiana-based casino client.

In the film, Gibney did not call Schmidt on the carpet for her gross journalistic transgression or question her on this matter at all. Why he gave her a free pass I find puzzling. Although Casino jack and the united states of money review did mention that McCain had suppressed many of Abramoff's subpoenaed emails, Gibney did not provide a readily available and widely known specific numerical percentage.

This highly selective release of emails allowed McCain to paint Abramoff legal gambling online best sites the worst possible light, especially since Abramoff foolishly decided not to defend himself during the hearings.

On advice of counsel, Abramoff exercised his Fifth Amendment right, which led many to conclude he was guilty. Gibney did point out that McCain suppressed many of Abramoff's emails, but that he did so to avoid injuring his fellow Republicans. That was only partly true. The tiny fraction of emails McCain released had casino jack and the united states of money review selected and taken out of context in order to generate the greatest possible damage to Abramoff.


Casino Jack and The United States of Money OFFICIAL TRAILER ENGLISH !!!!!

Some more links:
- jackpot city winners
With Alex Gibney's doc “Casino Jack and the United States of Money” also around, Parts of this review were contained in my report from Toronto.
- canadian poker
Is CASINO JACK AND THE UNITED STATES OF MONEY family friendly? Find out only at Movieguide. The Family and Christian Guide to .
- royal vegas casino download
Review: United States of corruption - When mega-lobbyist Jack Abramoff was sentenced to jail in early , he was seen as the personification of corruption.
- online slots promotions
Title: Casino Jack and the United States of Money () / Want to share IMDb's Write review. Clear your history. Recently Viewed. IMDb Everywhere.
- poker bonus member baru tanpa deposit
Casino Jack and the United States of Money movie reviews & Metacritic score: This portrait of Washington super lobbyist Jack Abramoff—from his early years.
- Sitemap